Magic Duels vs Rise of the Tomb Raider
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Magic Duels vs Rise of the Tomb Raider — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Magic Duels Wizards of the Coast | Rise of the Tomb Raider Square Enix, Microsoft Studios, Feral Interactive |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | July 8, 2015 | November 10, 2015 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | Stainless Games, Wizards of the Coast | Feral Interactive, Crystal Dynamics, Nixxes |
| Publisher | Wizards of the Coast | Square Enix, Microsoft Studios, Feral Interactive |
| Official Site | http://magic.wizards.com/en/content/magic-duels | http://www.tombraider.com/us/ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Strategy, Card | Action |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Split-screen | Single-player |
| Average Playtime | 2 hours | 14 hours |
| Perspective | — | Third-person |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC, Xbox, iOS | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Apple Macintosh |
| Available On | Xbox Store, Steam, App Store | Xbox Store, Steam, Xbox 360 Store, App Store, Epic Games Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows 8/7 (XP not supported) Processor: 2GHz CPU (Pentium 4 or equivalent) Memory: 1 GB RAM Graphics: 512MB DirectX 11.0 compatible video card with Pixelshader 3.0 support DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 2500 MB available space Sound Card: DirectX 11.0 compatible sound card Additional Notes: 1GB RAM (2GB for Windows 7) | OS: Windows 7 64bit Processor: Intel Core i3-2100 or AMD equivalent Memory: 6 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 650 2GB or AMD HD7770 2GB DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 25 GB available space |
| Recommended Requirements | — | OS: Windows 10 64 bit Processor: Intel Core i7-3770K Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 980Ti 2560x1440 or NVIDIA GTX 970 1920x1080 DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 25 GB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 2.9 / 5 (234 ratings) | 4.0 / 5 (2,808 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 86 / 100 |