Gang Beasts vs Rise of the Tomb Raider
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Gang Beasts vs Rise of the Tomb Raider — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Gang Beasts Double Fine Productions | Rise of the Tomb Raider Square Enix, Microsoft Studios, Feral Interactive |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | August 29, 2014 | November 10, 2015 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | Double Fine Productions, Boneloaf | Feral Interactive, Crystal Dynamics, Nixxes |
| Publisher | Double Fine Productions | Square Enix, Microsoft Studios, Feral Interactive |
| Official Site | http://gangbeasts.game | http://www.tombraider.com/us/ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual, Indie | Action |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Split-screen, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | Third-person | Third-person |
| Average Playtime | 2 hours | 14 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Apple Macintosh, Linux | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Apple Macintosh |
| Available On | PlayStation Store, Steam, Xbox Store | Xbox Store, Steam, Xbox 360 Store, App Store, Epic Games Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista Processor: Core i3 Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: SM3 512MB VRAM Network: Broadband Internet connection Storage: 2 GB available space | OS: Windows 7 64bit Processor: Intel Core i3-2100 or AMD equivalent Memory: 6 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 650 2GB or AMD HD7770 2GB DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 25 GB available space |
| Recommended Requirements | OS: Windows 10 Processor: Core i5 Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: SM4 1GB VRAM Network: Broadband Internet connection Storage: 2 GB available space | OS: Windows 10 64 bit Processor: Intel Core i7-3770K Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 980Ti 2560x1440 or NVIDIA GTX 970 1920x1080 DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 25 GB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.9 / 5 (401 ratings) | 4.0 / 5 (2,808 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 86 / 100 |