Fight’N Rage vs Rise of the Tomb Raider
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Fight’N Rage vs Rise of the Tomb Raider — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Fight’N Rage BlitWorks, sebagamesdev | Rise of the Tomb Raider Square Enix, Microsoft Studios, Feral Interactive |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | September 18, 2017 | November 10, 2015 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Age Rating | Teen | — |
| Developer | sebagamesdev | Feral Interactive, Crystal Dynamics, Nixxes |
| Publisher | BlitWorks, sebagamesdev | Square Enix, Microsoft Studios, Feral Interactive |
| Official Site | http://fightnrage.com | http://www.tombraider.com/us/ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Indie | Action |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Local Co-op, Split-screen | Single-player |
| Perspective | 2D | Third-person |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 14 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Apple Macintosh |
| Available On | Xbox Store, Nintendo eShop, PlayStation Store, Steam, GOG | Xbox Store, Steam, Xbox 360 Store, App Store, Epic Games Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows 7 or newer Processor: Dual Core 2.4 GHz Memory: 2 GB RAM Graphics: Intel(R) HD Graphics (OpenGL 3.0.0, Shader Version 1.2) Storage: 400 MB available space | OS: Windows 7 64bit Processor: Intel Core i3-2100 or AMD equivalent Memory: 6 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 650 2GB or AMD HD7770 2GB DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 25 GB available space |
| Recommended Requirements | OS: Windows 7 Processor: Core i5 Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: NVidia Geforce GTX 660 or better Storage: 400 MB available space | OS: Windows 10 64 bit Processor: Intel Core i7-3770K Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 980Ti 2560x1440 or NVIDIA GTX 970 1920x1080 DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 25 GB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.2 / 5 (54 ratings) | 4.0 / 5 (2,808 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 86 / 100 |