3DMark vs Rise of the Tomb Raider
A full spec-by-spec comparison of 3DMark vs Rise of the Tomb Raider — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | 3DMark Futuremark | Rise of the Tomb Raider Square Enix, Microsoft Studios, Feral Interactive |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Developer | Futuremark | Feral Interactive, Crystal Dynamics, Nixxes |
| Publisher | Futuremark | Square Enix, Microsoft Studios, Feral Interactive |
| Official Site | http://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/3dmark | http://www.tombraider.com/us/ |
| Release Date | — | November 10, 2015 |
| Availability | — | Released |
| Gameplay | ||
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 14 hours |
| Genre | — | Action |
| Game Modes | — | Single-player |
| Perspective | — | Third-person |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Apple Macintosh |
| Available On | Steam | Xbox Store, Steam, Xbox 360 Store, App Store, Epic Games Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS:Windows Vista* Processor:1.8 GHz dual-core Memory:2 GB RAM Graphics:DirectX 9** Storage:3 GB space Please refer to the DLC pages for the system requirements for each individual benchmark test. * Windows Vista users will need to install the DirectX 11 platform update from Microsoft. ** You can use 3DMark to test DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 compatible hardware, but you will need a DirectX 11 compatible video card to run all of the tests. DirectX 9 hardware needs Shader Model 3.0 support, 128MB video card memory and WDDM 1.1 drivers. | OS: Windows 7 64bit Processor: Intel Core i3-2100 or AMD equivalent Memory: 6 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 650 2GB or AMD HD7770 2GB DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 25 GB available space |
| Recommended Requirements | — | OS: Windows 10 64 bit Processor: Intel Core i7-3770K Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 980Ti 2560x1440 or NVIDIA GTX 970 1920x1080 DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 25 GB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.4 / 5 (158 ratings) | 4.0 / 5 (2,808 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 86 / 100 |