Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 vs Waking Mars
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 vs Waking Mars — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Kepler Interactive | Waking Mars Tiger Style Games, Tiger Style |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | April 24, 2025 | February 29, 2012 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | Sundial Interactive, Sandfall Interactive | Tiger Style, Tiger Style Games |
| Publisher | Kepler Interactive | Tiger Style Games, Tiger Style |
| Official Site | https://www.expedition33.com | http://www.wakingmars.com |
| Age Rating | — | Everyone 10+ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | RPG | Action, Adventure, Simulation, Arcade, Indie, Platformer |
| Game Modes | Single-player | Single-player |
| Perspective | Third-person, 3D | 2D |
| Average Playtime | 26 hours | 1 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC, PlayStation, Xbox | PC, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, Linux |
| Available On | Epic Games Store, Steam, PlayStation Store, Xbox Store | App Store, GOG, Steam, Google Play |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | Мінімальні: Потребує 64-бітних процесора та операційної системи ОС: Windows 10 Процесор: Intel Core i7-8700K / AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Оперативна пам’ять: 8 GB ОП Відеокарта: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB / AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6 GB / Intel Arc A380 6 GB DirectX: версії 12 Місце на диску: 55 GB доступного місця Додаткові примітки: SSD required. Minimum specs allow for 1080p 30FPS low settings gameplay. | OS:Windows XP Processor:x86-compatible, 2-Ghz or faster Memory:512 MB RAM Graphics:OpenGL 3.0, or OpenGL 2.1 with framebuffer extensions Hard Drive:400 MB HD space |
| Recommended Requirements | Рекомендовані: Потребує 64-бітних процесора та операційної системи ОС: Windows 11 Процесор: Intel Core i7-12700K / AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Оперативна пам’ять: 16 GB ОП Відеокарта: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB / AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16 GB DirectX: версії 12 Місце на диску: 55 GB доступного місця Додаткові примітки: SSD required. Recommended specs allow for 1080p 60FPS high settings gameplay. | — |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 4.5 / 5 (447 ratings) | 3.3 / 5 (66 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 79 / 100 |
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 vs Waking Mars: which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 and Waking Mars hinges on your gaming preferences and PC hardware. Clair Obscur is a modern, cinematic 3D RPG with a rich story and approximately 26 hours of gameplay. However, it demands a powerful PC (GTX 1060 minimum, RTX 3060 Ti recommended, SSD required, 55GB space) and is only available on PC, PlayStation, and Xbox. It has a stellar 4.5/5 community rating. In contrast, Waking Mars is a simple 2D adventure/platformer with a very short playtime of about 1 hour, runs on even the most modest hardware (Windows XP, 512MB RAM, 400MB space), and is available on PC, iOS, Android, Mac, and Linux. Its Metacritic score is 79, but community rating is 3.3/5. Neither game lists a price in the data, so cost comparison is impossible. If you have a high-end gaming rig and love deep RPGs, Clair Obscur is the pick. If you prefer a quick, lightweight indie experience that runs on any old PC or mobile device, Waking Mars is the way to go.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper?
The data does not include prices for either Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 or Waking Mars, so no price comparison can be made.
Which game runs on a low-end PC?
Waking Mars runs on very low-end PCs (Windows XP, 512MB RAM, 400MB space) and even mobile devices, while Clair Obscur requires a modern PC with at least a GTX 1060 and SSD.
Which game has more playtime?
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 has an average playtime of 26 hours, whereas Waking Mars averages just 1 hour.
Which game is better for story and graphics?
Clair Obscur is a 3D RPG with a narrative focus and high-quality visuals, rated 4.5/5. Waking Mars is a 2D indie platformer with simpler graphics and a Metacritic score of 79.