Blood and Bacon vs Worms
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Worms — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Worms Microsoft Studios, Team17 Digital, Ocean Software |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | January 1, 1995 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Team17 Digital, Games from YovoGames ! |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Microsoft Studios, Team17 Digital, Ocean Software |
| Age Rating | — | Teen |
| Official Site | — | http://www.facebook.com/WormsTeam17 |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Strategy, Arcade |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player, Multiplayer |
| Perspective | First-person | 2D |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 1 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Apple Macintosh, Nintendo, Atari, Commodore / Amiga, SEGA |
| Available On | Steam | PlayStation Store, Steam, Xbox 360 Store, App Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | A 100% Windows XP/Vista/7 compatible computer system |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.8 / 5 (259 ratings) |
Blood and Bacon vs Worms: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, Worms is the definitive choice due to its massive platform ecosystem and superior longevity, whereas Blood and Bacon is a niche, low-cost option for casual PC gamers. While Blood and Bacon offers a modern 2016 release with co-op modes, its Windows Vista requirement and 300 MB storage demand make it impractical for many users, and its 3.1 community rating suggests lower quality. Conversely, Worms, released in 1995, remains available across dozens of devices including consoles and mobile, boasting a higher 3.8 community rating and a more flexible Windows XP requirement. If you value cross-platform versatility and proven longevity over a short, single-platform experience, Worms is the practical investment. Blood and Bacon only makes sense if you specifically need a 2016-style single-player action game on PC with minimal storage space.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is more powerful and has better performance ratings?
Worms has a higher community rating of 3.8 compared to Blood and Bacon's 3.1, and it supports a wider range of hardware including multiple consoles and mobile devices, whereas Blood and Bacon is limited to PC.
Which game is cheaper and has lower system requirements?
Both games are listed as released without specific pricing, but Blood and Bacon requires only 300 MB of storage and a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor, while Worms requires a system compatible with Windows XP, Vista, or 7.
Which game is better for daily commuting or travel?
Worms is the clear choice for commuting as it is available on PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Mac, Nintendo, Atari, and Commodore/Amiga, while Blood and Bacon is exclusively available on PC.
Which game offers more features and game modes?
Blood and Bacon offers more modes including single-player, multiplayer, co-op, online co-op, and online multiplayer, whereas Worms only offers single-player and multiplayer modes.