Blood and Bacon vs Waking Mars
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Waking Mars — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Waking Mars Tiger Style Games, Tiger Style |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | February 29, 2012 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Tiger Style, Tiger Style Games |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Tiger Style Games, Tiger Style |
| Age Rating | — | Everyone 10+ |
| Official Site | — | http://www.wakingmars.com |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Adventure, Simulation, Arcade, Indie, Platformer |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | First-person | 2D |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 1 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, Linux |
| Available On | Steam | App Store, GOG, Steam, Google Play |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS:Windows XP Processor:x86-compatible, 2-Ghz or faster Memory:512 MB RAM Graphics:OpenGL 3.0, or OpenGL 2.1 with framebuffer extensions Hard Drive:400 MB HD space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.3 / 5 (66 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 79 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs Waking Mars: which should you buy?
Waking Mars offers a better gaming experience with its higher Metacritic score and modern platform availability across multiple devices including PC, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, and Linux.
1: Which is cheaper between Blood and Bacon and Waking Mars? Blood and Bacon costs 300MB of storage space which might be less expensive for some users. Waking Mars requires more space but it's available on multiple platforms including Steam, GOG, App Store, Google Play, making it potentially costlier.
2: Which game is more powerful to run smoothly? Waking Mars has lower minimum system requirements compared to Blood and Bacon, requiring less memory (512 MB RAM) and a faster processor. It also supports OpenGL 3.0 or higher which can lead to smoother gameplay on PC hardware with modern specifications.
3: Which game is better for daily commuting? Waking Mars has an average playtime of only 1 hour, making it more suitable for quick gaming sessions during commutes. Blood and Bacon's longer playtime (up to 3 hours) might not be ideal for short periods.
4: Which game offers a wider range of platforms and devices? Waking Mars is available on multiple platforms including PC, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, and Linux, offering more flexibility in terms of device compatibility. Blood and Bacon is only available on Steam, limiting its accessibility.