Blood and Bacon vs Unfortunate Spacemen

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Unfortunate Spacemen — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Unfortunate Spacemen New Blood Interactive, Sandswept
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 June 12, 2020
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Sandswept, Geoff "Zag" Keene
Publisher Grunge Games New Blood Interactive, Sandswept
Official Site http://unfortunate.space
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Action, Indie
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Multiplayer, Co-op
Perspective First-person
Average Playtime 3 hours 1 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC
Available On Steam Steam
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Windows 7 64-bit or later Processor: Quad-core Intel or AMD processor, 2.5 GHz or faster Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 470 GTX or AMD Radeon 6870 HD series card or higher DirectX: Version 9.0 Network: Broadband Internet connection Storage: 15 GB available space
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 2.8 / 5 (52 ratings)

Blood and Bacon vs Unfortunate Spacemen: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer prioritizing value and ease of use, Blood and Bacon is the better choice despite its older release date. It costs less to run with a minimum OS of Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up, a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor, 600 MB RAM, 300 MB storage, and DirectX 10—requirements that are far more accessible than Unfortunate Spacemen’s needs of Windows 7 64-bit or later, a quad-core processor at 2.5 GHz or faster, 4 GB RAM, 15 GB storage, and a higher-end GPU. Blood and Bacon offers greater practicality with support for multiple resolutions and AA settings, while Unfortunate Spacemen has fewer game modes and a shorter average playtime. Both support multiplayer and co-op, but Blood and Bacon’s broader compatibility and lower barrier to entry make it ideal for casual players on limited hardware. Unfortunate Spacemen, though newer and with better graphics requirements, lacks the flexibility and headroom for older systems. The price difference is not directly stated, but Blood and Bacon’s lower system requirements suggest a more affordable entry point. For daily commuting or casual play on shared devices, Blood and Bacon wins by a clear margin in accessibility and features.