Blood and Bacon vs Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar Electronic Arts, SEGA, Origin Systems, Pony Canyon, Elite Systems, Fujisankei Communications International
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 September 15, 1985
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Origin Systems, Elite Systems
Publisher Grunge Games Electronic Arts, SEGA, Origin Systems, Pony Canyon, Elite Systems, Fujisankei Communications International
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Adventure, RPG
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player
Perspective First-person
Average Playtime 3 hours 1 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, iOS, Apple Macintosh, Nintendo, Atari, Commodore / Amiga, SEGA
Available On Steam App Store, GOG
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 2.2 / 5 (156 ratings)

Blood and Bacon vs Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer seeking a modern, accessible gaming experience, Blood and Bacon is the clear choice. It costs no price mentioned in pesos, but it runs on current PC hardware like Windows Vista, Windows 7, or Windows 8 and up, with a minimum 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and 600 MB RAM—requirements that are practical for most local systems. It offers a first-person action-adventure experience with multiplayer, co-op, and online modes on Steam, supporting multiple resolutions and AA settings, with an average playtime of 3 hours. In contrast, Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar, released in 1985, has no price listed and requires outdated platforms like Atari, Commodore Amiga, and Nintendo, making it impractical for modern setups. It only supports single-player mode, has a much shorter average playtime of 1 hour, and lacks modern features like online play or high-resolution support. While Blood and Bacon offers more gameplay variety and modern technical support, Ultima IV is only suitable for collectors’ interest, not daily use. Blood and Bacon wins for accessibility, power, and features within current Filipino tech limits.

Frequently asked questions

Which game is cheaper for a Filipino buyer?

Both games have no price mentioned in pesos, so the cost cannot be determined from the data provided.

Which game is more powerful and compatible with current Filipino PCs?

Blood and Bacon runs on Windows Vista, 7, 8 and up, 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, 600 MB RAM, Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D, Hardware Acceleration DirectX 10, with minimum 300 MB storage and sound card requirement. Ultima IV uses obsolete hardware like Atari, Commodore Amiga, Nintendo, and SEGA.

Which game has better gameplay features for daily use?

Blood and Bacon offers single-player, multiplayer, co-op, online co-op, online multiplayer modes with first-person perspective and support for multiple resolutions and AA settings. Ultima IV only supports single-player mode.

Which game is more practical for daily commuting or casual play?

Blood and Bacon is on Steam, a modern platform, with a 3-hour playtime and support for online multiplayer. Ultima IV has a 1-hour playtime and is only available on App Store, GOG, and outdated systems, making it impractical for daily use.