Blood and Bacon vs Thomas Was Alone
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Thomas Was Alone — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Thomas Was Alone Curve Digital, Bossa Studios, Bithell Games |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | June 30, 2012 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Curve Digital, Bossa Studios, Bithell Games, Mike Bithell |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Curve Digital, Bossa Studios, Bithell Games |
| Age Rating | — | Everyone |
| Official Site | — | http://www.bithellgames.com |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Adventure, Family, Indie |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | First-person | 2D |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 2 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, Linux, Nintendo |
| Available On | Steam | App Store, PlayStation Store, Xbox Store, Steam, Nintendo eShop, Google Play |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS:Windows XP Processor:500 Mhz Memory:1 GB RAM DirectX®:7.0 Hard Drive:400 MB HD space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.7 / 5 (541 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 77 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs Thomas Was Alone: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a casual, accessible experience with minimal hardware demands, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs 0 PHP less than Thomas Was Alone, runs on older Windows systems (Vista, 7, 8 and up), and requires only 600 MB of RAM and 300 MB of storage—ideal for basic PCs. Thomas Was Alone offers a higher community rating (3.7 vs 3.1) and broader platform support across PC, consoles, and mobile, but at a cost of higher system requirements (1 GB RAM, 400 MB HD space) and no price difference in the data provided. Blood and Bacon’s focus on single-player, while Thomas Was Alone supports multiple platforms, makes Blood and Bacon more practical for casual play on basic setups. Neither is cheaper by a significant margin, and both share similar availability on Steam and other digital stores. The key practical difference is the lower barrier to entry for Blood and Bacon, despite its smaller price gap and limited platform reach.
Frequently asked questions
Which game costs less in Philippine pesos?
Blood and Bacon costs 0 PHP less than Thomas Was Alone.
Which game runs on older Windows systems?
Blood and Bacon runs on Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up.
Which game has better hardware efficiency for basic PCs?
Blood and Bacon requires only 600 MB RAM and 300 MB of storage.
Which game has broader platform availability?
Thomas Was Alone is available on PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, Linux, and Nintendo.