Blood and Bacon vs Tannenberg

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Tannenberg — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Tannenberg M2H, Blackmill Games
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 February 13, 2019
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG M2H, Blackmill Games
Publisher Grunge Games M2H, Blackmill Games
Age Rating Everyone
Official Site http://www.tannenberggame.com
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Action, Shooter, Strategy, Simulation, Indie
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Multiplayer
Perspective First-person
Average Playtime 3 hours 4 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Apple Macintosh, Linux
Available On Steam Epic Games Store, Xbox Store, PlayStation Store, Steam
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Windows Vista/7/8/10 Processor: Intel Core2 Duo 2.4Ghz or Higher / AMD 3Ghz or Higher Memory: 3 GB RAM Graphics: Geforce GTX 960M / Radeon HD 7750 or higher, 1GB video card memory DirectX: Version 9.0c Network: Broadband Internet connection Storage: 6 GB available space Additional Notes: Multiplayer only, make sure you have a stable and fast internet connection.
Recommended Requirements OS: Windows 10 Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: 2GB video card memory DirectX: Version 11 Network: Broadband Internet connection
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 3.5 / 5 (62 ratings)

Blood and Bacon vs Tannenberg: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer prioritizing value and accessibility, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs no additional price data to compare, but it runs on Windows Vista through Windows 10, making it more broadly compatible with older PCs common in the Philippines. The game offers a shorter average playtime of 3 hours and supports multiple resolutions and AA settings, which are practical for casual play. However, it has a lower community rating (3.1/5) compared to Tannenberg. Tannenberg is more powerful, requiring Intel Core2 Duo 2.4GHz or higher and 3 GB RAM, with a longer playtime of 4 hours, but it needs 6 GB storage and a stable broadband connection, which may be a barrier for some. Blood and Bacon’s lower storage requirement of 300 MB is a major practical advantage, while Tannenberg’s broader platform support—including PlayStation, Xbox, and Apple Macintosh—adds versatility. Despite Tannenberg’s higher power, Blood and Bacon wins for affordability, ease of access, and minimal system demands, making it ideal for casual gamers on limited budgets.

Frequently asked questions

Which game is cheaper?

The data does not specify prices, so the cost cannot be determined from the provided information.

Which game is more powerful?

Tannenberg is more powerful, requiring Intel Core2 Duo 2.4GHz or higher and 3 GB RAM, with a longer playtime of 4 hours.

Which game is better for daily commuting?

Blood and Bacon is more practical due to its lower storage requirement of 300 MB and broader OS compatibility from Windows Vista to Windows 10.

Which game has better community ratings?

Tannenberg has a higher community rating of 3.5/5 compared to Blood and Bacon’s 3.1/5.