Blood and Bacon vs Rock of Ages 2: Bigger & Boulder
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Rock of Ages 2: Bigger & Boulder — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Rock of Ages 2: Bigger & Boulder SEGA, Atlus USA |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | August 28, 2017 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | ACE Team |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | SEGA, Atlus USA |
| Official Site | — | http://www.rockofages2.com/ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Strategy, Racing, Arcade |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Local Co-op, Split-screen, Online Multiplayer |
| Perspective | First-person | — |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 2 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo |
| Available On | Steam | Nintendo eShop, PlayStation Store, Steam, Xbox Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: 64-Bit Windows 7 Service Pack 1, or Windows 8 Processor: 2 GHz Dual-Core 64-bit CPU Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: DirectX10 Compatible GPU with 1 GB Video RAM DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 6 GB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.6 / 5 (99 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 77 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs Rock of Ages 2: Bigger & Boulder: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a budget-friendly, accessible gaming experience, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs no additional price data, but runs on older OS versions (Windows Vista, 7, 8 and up) with a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and 600 MB RAM, making it more practical for lower-end PCs. It supports multiple resolutions, AA settings, and online multiplayer on Steam, offering flexibility without demanding high specs. In contrast, Rock of Ages 2 requires a 2 GHz Dual-Core 64-bit CPU, 4 GB RAM, and 6 GB storage, which are significantly more demanding and costly in terms of system requirements—though no price is listed. While Rock of Ages 2 offers a higher Metacritic score (77) and broader platform support (PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo), its power needs exceed what Blood and Bacon provides. Blood and Bacon’s shorter average playtime (3 hours vs 2 hours) and simpler hardware make it more accessible for casual gamers. Rock of Ages 2 is better for those with stronger systems who prefer strategy and racing elements. For most Filipino households with limited hardware, Blood and Bacon delivers more value through lower system thresholds and online connectivity, while Rock of Ages 2 is only recommended for players with advanced setups and larger storage needs.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper to run on a typical Filipino home PC?
Blood and Bacon runs on Windows Vista, 7, 8 and up with a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and 600 MB RAM, while Rock of Ages 2 requires a 2 GHz Dual-Core 64-bit CPU, 4 GB RAM, and 6 GB storage.
Which game is more demanding in terms of system power?
Rock of Ages 2 requires a 2 GHz Dual-Core 64-bit CPU, 4 GB RAM, and 6 GB available space, whereas Blood and Bacon only needs 600 MB RAM and lower-tier hardware.
Which game has better platform availability for online play?
Blood and Bacon is available on Steam, while Rock of Ages 2 is on Steam, Nintendo eShop, PlayStation Store, and Xbox Store.
Which game offers a longer average playtime?
Blood and Bacon has an average playtime of 3 hours, compared to 2 hours for Rock of Ages 2.