Blood and Bacon vs Project Mercury

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Project Mercury — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Project Mercury Raxasoft Games
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 September 20, 2017
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Raxasoft Games
Publisher Grunge Games Raxasoft Games
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Action, Indie
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player
Perspective First-person
Average Playtime 3 hours 1 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC
Available On Steam Steam
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Windows XP or later Processor: 1.8 GHz SSE2 Capable CPU Memory: 256 MB RAM Graphics: Direct3D 9 Compatible Graphics Card DirectX: Version 9.0c Storage: 20 MB available space
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 1.9 / 5 (48 ratings)

Blood and Bacon vs Project Mercury: which should you buy?

For Filipino gamers looking for a balanced experience with stronger system requirements and broader gameplay options, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs 300 MB of storage, which is more than Project Mercury’s 20 MB, but Blood and Bacon supports multiple resolutions, AA settings, and online multiplayer across PC via Steam, while Project Mercury only offers single-player mode and outdated graphics (Direct3D 9 Compatible). Blood and Bacon runs on Windows Vista and up, with a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and 600 MB, whereas Project Mercury uses a 1.8 GHz SSE2 processor and 256 MB RAM. Blood and Bacon also has a higher average playtime (3 hours vs 1 hour), more developer support from BIG, and a significantly better community rating (3.1/5 vs 1.9/5). For daily commuting or extended sessions, Blood and Bacon’s online co-op and multiplayer features provide more practicality. Project Mercury, though cheaper in storage space, lacks essential multiplayer and modern graphics capabilities, making it less suitable for active play. Blood and Bacon’s broader platform support and higher performance make it the superior option for Filipino buyers prioritizing depth, connectivity, and system readiness.

Frequently asked questions

Which game is cheaper in terms of storage cost for Filipino buyers?

Project Mercury requires 20 MB of storage, while Blood and Bacon requires 300 MB of storage.

Which game is more powerful in terms of processor and graphics support?

Blood and Bacon uses a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D, Hardware Acceleration DirectX 10, while Project Mercury uses a 1.8 GHz SSE2 processor and Direct3D 9 Compatible Graphics Card DirectX 9.0c.

Which game offers better multiplayer experience for Filipino players?

Blood and Bacon supports Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, and Online Multiplayer, whereas Project Mercury only offers Single-player mode.

Which game has a better community reception for Filipino players?

Blood and Bacon has a community rating of 3.1/5 from 115 ratings, while Project Mercury has a rating of 1.9/5 from 48 ratings.