Blood and Bacon vs PixelJunk Shooter
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs PixelJunk Shooter — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | PixelJunk Shooter Double Eleven |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | December 10, 2009 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Sony Interactive Entertainment, Double Eleven |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Double Eleven |
| Age Rating | — | Everyone 10+ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Shooter, Arcade |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player, Co-op, Local Co-op, Split-screen |
| Perspective | First-person | 2D |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 3 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Apple Macintosh, Linux |
| Available On | Steam | PlayStation Store, Steam, GOG |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: Windows Vista Service Pack 2 Processor: 2.5Ghz i3 Equivalent Processor Memory: 2 GB RAM Graphics: DirectX 10 Compliant Graphics Device, Radeon 5450, NVidia 8600, Intel HD 3000 or better @720p DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 250 MB available space Sound Card: XAudio 2-Compatible Sound Card |
| Recommended Requirements | — | OS: Windows 7 Processor: 2.8Ghz i5 Equivalent Processor Memory: 2 GB RAM Graphics: DirectX 10 Compliant Graphics Device, Radeon 5770, NVidia GTX 470, Intel HD 4000 DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 250 MB available space Sound Card: XAudio 2-Compatible Sound Card |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.4 / 5 (65 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 73 / 100 |