Blood and Bacon vs Oddworld: Stranger’s Wrath

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Oddworld: Stranger’s Wrath — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Oddworld: Stranger’s Wrath Oddworld Inhabitants
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 January 25, 2005
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Oddworld Inhabitants
Publisher Grunge Games Oddworld Inhabitants
Age Rating Teen
Official Site http://www.oddworld.com
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Action, Shooter, Adventure, Strategy
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player
Perspective First-person First-person, Third-person
Average Playtime 3 hours 1 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, Xbox, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh
Available On Steam GOG, Steam, Google Play, App Store
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Windows XP/Vista/7 Processor: Intel Core 2+ Memory: 2 GB Graphics: nVidia 6600 or better or ATI x1600 or better (256 MB+) DirectX®: 9 Hard Drive: 4 GB Sound: Any DirectX 9 compatible Sound Card Other: OpenGL2.0
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 3.7 / 5 (123 ratings)

Blood and Bacon vs Oddworld: Stranger’s Wrath: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for a budget-friendly, accessible gaming experience on a standard PC, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs nothing more than the Steam price for PC, requires only Windows Vista or higher, and runs on a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 with 600 MB RAM—minimal specs that make it ideal for casual play. Oddworld: Stranger’s Wrath demands an Intel Core 2+ processor, 2 GB memory, and a 4 GB hard drive, making it significantly more demanding and expensive in terms of system resources. While Blood and Bacon offers co-op and online multiplayer modes with a 3-hour average playtime, Oddworld focuses solely on single-player action with a much shorter playtime. Blood and Bacon is more practical for everyday use, needing only 300 MB storage and DirectX 10, whereas Oddworld requires 4 GB of storage and advanced hardware like nVidia 6600 or better. The community rating for Blood and Bacon is 3.1/5 (115 ratings), while Oddworld scores higher at 3.7/5 (123 ratings)—though this does not reflect system requirements. For power, price, and accessibility, Blood and Bacon wins.

Frequently asked questions

Which game is cheaper to run on a typical Filipino PC?

Blood and Bacon costs nothing more than the Steam price for PC, requiring only Windows Vista or higher, while Oddworld: Stranger’s Wrath demands a more powerful system with Intel Core 2+ processor and 2 GB memory.

Which game has better hardware requirements for older devices?

Blood and Bacon runs on Windows Vista, 7, 8 and up, 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, 600 MB RAM, and 300 MB storage, which are more accessible than Oddworld’s 4 GB hard drive and nVidia 6600 or better.

Which game is better for multiplayer play?

Blood and Bacon supports single-player, multiplayer, co-op, online co-op, and online multiplayer modes, while Oddworld only supports single-player mode.

Which game is better for daily commuting?

Blood and Bacon is more practical with only 300 MB storage, while Oddworld requires 4 GB hard drive, making it less suitable for limited space.