Blood and Bacon vs Neon Chrome
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Neon Chrome — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Neon Chrome 10tons |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | April 25, 2016 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | 10tons |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | 10tons |
| Official Site | — | http://www.neonchromegame.com |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Shooter, Adventure, RPG, Indie |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player, Local Co-op, Split-screen |
| Perspective | First-person | First-person, Top-down |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 3 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, Linux, Nintendo |
| Available On | Steam | App Store, PlayStation Store, Steam, Nintendo eShop, Xbox Store, GOG, Google Play |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: Windows XP / Vista / 7 / 8 / 10 Processor: 2 Ghz Memory: 2048 MB RAM Graphics: SM 3.0+ DirectX: Version 9.0c Storage: 200 MB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 2.9 / 5 (149 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 74 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs Neon Chrome: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing affordability and broad accessibility, Blood and Bacon is the better choice despite its lower community rating. At 300 MB of storage, it is significantly lighter than Neon Chrome’s 200 MB requirement, making it more practical for older hardware or limited internet bandwidth. However, Blood and Bacon only runs on PC via Steam, while Neon Chrome supports PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, Linux, and Nintendo—offering far greater versatility. Blood and Bacon’s 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 minimum processor may struggle on modern systems, whereas Neon Chrome’s 2 GHz processor (SM 3.0+ graphics, DirectX 9.0c) suggests better performance. Both games have the same 3-hour playtime and first-person perspective, but Blood and Bacon lacks local co-op and split-screen options, limiting multiplayer flexibility. With Blood and Bacon costing less to access via Steam and requiring minimal storage, it suits casual players on tight budgets. Neon Chrome, though more powerful and widely supported across platforms, demands more memory and has a lower community rating. For daily commuting or multi-device play, Blood and Bacon’s simplicity wins, but for broader reach, Neon Chrome’s platform support is essential.
Frequently asked questions
Which game costs less to download for a Filipino buyer?
Blood and Bacon costs less, requiring only 300 MB of storage, while Neon Chrome needs 200 MB.
Which game is more powerful for older systems?
Blood and Bacon’s minimum processor is 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, which may struggle on modern systems, whereas Neon Chrome’s 2 GHz processor suggests better performance.
Which game has better multiplayer features?
Blood and Bacon supports single-player, multiplayer, co-op, online co-op, and online multiplayer, while Neon Chrome only offers single-player, local co-op, and split-screen.
Which game is better for daily commuting across devices?
Neon Chrome supports PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, Linux, and Nintendo, offering greater platform diversity compared to Blood and Bacon’s PC-only availability.