Blood and Bacon vs Louvre: The Final Curse
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Louvre: The Final Curse — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Louvre: The Final Curse Microids, DreamCatcher Interactive |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | February 15, 2001 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Devolver Digital, Canal+ Multimedia, Arxel Tribe, Index+, Canal+ |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Microids, DreamCatcher Interactive |
| Age Rating | — | Teen |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Adventure, Educational |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | First-person | 2D |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 5 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, iOS, Apple Macintosh |
| Available On | Steam | — |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | 7 SP1 / 8 / 10 Processor: Intel core i5-4210 1.7ghz Memory: 1 GB RAM Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 4400 Storage: 650 MB available space Sound Card: Onboard soundcard or better |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.1 / 5 (58 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 61 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs Louvre: The Final Curse: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a budget-friendly, accessible gaming experience on a standard PC, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. At 300 MB storage and a minimum OS of Windows Vista, it requires minimal hardware—only 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 and 600 MB RAM—making it highly practical for older systems or low-end setups. While Louvre: The Final Curse offers more storage (650 MB) and a longer average playtime (5 hours), it demands an Intel core i5-4210 1.7ghz processor and 1 GB RAM, which are significantly more demanding and costly to maintain. Blood and Bacon supports multiple resolutions and AA settings, while Louvre only lists 2D perspective. Both games have identical community ratings of similar playtimes, but Blood and Bacon’s broader genre support and online multiplayer options provide greater versatility. For a Filipino buyer prioritizing accessibility, low cost, and ease of use, Blood and Bacon wins.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper to run on a typical Filipino home PC?
Blood and Bacon requires only 600 MB RAM and a Windows Vista OS, while Louvre: The Final Curse needs 1 GB RAM and a Windows 7 SP1 OS, making Blood and Bacon more budget-friendly.
Which game is more powerful in terms of hardware requirements?
Louvre: The Final Curse requires an Intel core i5-4210 1.7ghz processor and Intel HD Graphics 4400, whereas Blood and Bacon only needs a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, indicating Louvre is more powerful.
Which game offers better practicality for daily commuting?
Blood and Bacon supports multiple resolutions and AA settings, while Louvre only lists 2D perspective, but both require similar minimum storage of 300 MB and 650 MB respectively.
Which game has a longer average playtime?
Louvre: The Final Curse has an average playtime of 5 hours, while Blood and Bacon is listed at 3 hours, making Louvre longer in duration.