Blood and Bacon vs Layers of Fear
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Layers of Fear — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Layers of Fear Aspyr, Bloober Team |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | February 16, 2016 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Bloober Team, Anshar Studios |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Aspyr, Bloober Team |
| Age Rating | — | Mature |
| Official Site | — | http://layersoffear.com |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Adventure, Indie |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | First-person | First-person |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 3 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Apple Macintosh, Linux |
| Available On | Steam | PlayStation Store, Epic Games Store, Steam, GOG, Xbox Store, App Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system OS: Win 10 with support for DirectX 12 Agility SDK Processor: Intel Core i5 4690/ AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB/ AMD RX 580 4GB DirectX: Version 12 Storage: 20 GB available space |
| Recommended Requirements | — | Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system OS: Win 10 with support for DirectX 12 Agility SDK Processor: Intel Core i7 8700K/ AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Memory: 12 GB RAM Graphics: Nvidia GTX 1070 8GB DirectX: Version 12 Storage: 20 GB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.5 / 5 (1,119 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 72 / 100 |