Blood and Bacon vs Journey of a Roach

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Journey of a Roach — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Journey of a Roach Daedalic Entertainment
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 October 4, 2013
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Daedalic Entertainment, Koboldgames, Kobold Games
Publisher Grunge Games Daedalic Entertainment
Age Rating Teen
Official Site http://www.journeyofaroach.de
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Adventure, Indie, Puzzle
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player, Multiplayer
Perspective First-person
Average Playtime 3 hours 3 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, iOS, Apple Macintosh, Linux
Available On Steam App Store, Steam, GOG
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Windows Vista/7 Processor: 2.5 GHz (Single Core) or better Memory: 2 GB RAM Graphics: OpenGL 2.0 compatible with 256 MB RAM (shared memory not recommended) DirectX: Version 9.0c Storage: 2500 MB available space Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card and drivers Additional Notes: Keyboard, Mouse
Recommended Requirements OS: Windows 7/8 Processor: 2.5 GHz (Single Core) or better Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: OpenGL 2.0 compatible with 512 MB RAM (shared memory not recommended) DirectX: Version 9.0c Storage: 2500 MB available space Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card and drivers Additional Notes: Keyboard, Mouse, Microsoft XBox Controller
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 3.0 / 5 (60 ratings)
Metacritic 65 / 100

Blood and Bacon vs Journey of a Roach: which should you buy?

For Filipino gamers on a budget who want a simple, fast-paced experience without demanding hardware, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs no price mentioned, runs on basic Windows systems, and requires only 300 MB of storage on PC via Steam—ideal for casual play. In contrast, Journey of a Roach demands 2500 MB of storage, a higher memory of 4 GB (recommended), and a more powerful processor of 2.5 GHz (single core) or better, with support for iOS and Mac—features that are impractical for many Filipinos. While both games have an average playtime of 3 hours, Blood and Bacon offers broader multiplayer and co-op options on PC, whereas Journey of a Roach is limited to single-player and multiplayer on PC, iOS, Mac, and Linux. Blood and Bacon’s lower storage need and simpler requirements make it more accessible for everyday-accessible for those with current tech standards. For those who value accessibility and low system demands, Blood and Bacon wins.

Frequently asked questions

Which game is cheaper for Filipino buyers?

Blood and Bacon is priced at no price mentioned, while Journey of a Roach has no price mentioned. Blood and Bacon is therefore the only option with a stated price.

Which game is more powerful?

Journey of a Roach requires a 2.5 GHz processor, 4 GB RAM, and 2500 MB storage, while Blood and Bacon only needs 1.2 GHz, 600 MB RAM, and 300 MB storage. Journey of a Roach is more powerful.

Which game is better for daily commuting?

Blood and Bacon runs on PC via Steam with basic Windows systems, while Journey of a Roach requires Windows Vista/7 or higher and supports multiple platforms including iOS and Mac. Blood and Bacon is more practical for commuting.

Which game has better community reception?

Blood and Bacon has a community rating of 3.1 / 5 from 115 ratings, while Journey of a Roach has 3.0 / 5 from 60 ratings. Blood and Bacon has a slightly better rating.