Blood and Bacon vs Jotun: Valhalla Edition

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Jotun: Valhalla Edition — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Jotun: Valhalla Edition Thunder Lotus Games
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 September 29, 2015
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Thunder Lotus, Thunder Lotus Games
Publisher Grunge Games Thunder Lotus Games
Age Rating Teen
Official Site http://jotungame.com/
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Action, Indie
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player
Perspective First-person Isometric, 2D
Average Playtime 3 hours 3 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Apple Macintosh, Linux, Nintendo
Available On Steam Xbox Store, Epic Games Store, itch.io, Steam, Nintendo eShop, GOG, PlayStation Store
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Microsoft® Windows® 7 Processor: 1.8 GHz Processor Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: DirectX 10-compatible graphics card with at least 256MB of video memory DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 8 GB available space
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 3.1 / 5 (507 ratings)
Metacritic 79 / 100

Blood and Bacon vs Jotun: Valhalla Edition: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer seeking value and versatility, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs 60 pesos less than Jotun: Valhalla Edition, with a minimum system requirement of Windows Vista, which is more accessible for older devices. Both games have the same 3-hour playtime and first-person perspective, but Blood and Bacon offers broader multiplayer and co-op options on PC via Steam, while Jotun is limited to single-player on more platforms. Jotun requires significantly more power—8 GB storage and 4 GB RAM—making it impractical for lower-end systems. Blood and Bacon supports multiple resolutions and AA settings, enhancing accessibility for daily performance. Given its affordability, broad compatibility, and sufficient specs for casual play, Blood and Bacon delivers better practicality for everyday use.