Blood and Bacon vs Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition Team17 Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | August 2, 2017 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Team Jolly Roger |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Team17 Digital |
| Official Site | — | http://www.interplanetarygame.com |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Strategy, Simulation, Indie |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player, Multiplayer, Split-screen, Online Multiplayer |
| Perspective | First-person | — |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 4 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, Apple Macintosh, Linux |
| Available On | Steam | Steam |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: Windows 7 64 bit Processor: DualCore AMD/Intel 2.3 Ghz Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: AMD HD 7700 Series, 1 GB VRAM or Nvidia/Intel equivalent DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 1024 MB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 2.7 / 5 (31 ratings) |
Blood and Bacon vs Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, Blood and Bacon is the clear choice if you prioritize affordability and ease of use, while Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition suits strategy fans with robust hardware. Blood and Bacon, released in 2016, is a lighter 300 MB game with minimal requirements (1.2 GHz Pentium 4, 600 MB RAM), making it accessible on older PCs or budget setups. In contrast, Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition, released in 2017, demands significantly more resources (DualCore 2.3 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 1 GB VRAM) and requires 1024 MB storage, which may limit its viability for users with aging hardware. Both are available on Steam, but Blood and Bacon offers a lower barrier to entry with its smaller 300 MB footprint versus Interplanetary's 1024 MB requirement. The decision hinges on your PC's capability: choose Blood and Bacon for casual, lightweight action on older systems, or select Interplanetary if you have a modern machine and want a 4-hour strategy simulation experience.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper or requires less storage space?
Blood and Bacon requires only 300 MB of storage space, whereas Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition needs 1024 MB. Additionally, Blood and Bacon has lower system requirements, making it the more budget-friendly option for older PCs.
Which game is more powerful and requires better hardware?
Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition requires significantly more power, needing a DualCore processor at 2.3 GHz, 4 GB RAM, and a graphics card with 1 GB VRAM. Blood and Bacon runs on a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 with only 600 MB RAM and no specific GPU requirement beyond Shader Model 3.0.
Which game is better for daily commuting or quick play sessions?
Blood and Bacon is better for quick sessions with an average playtime of 3 hours, compared to Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition's 4 hours. Its lightweight nature also makes it more practical for users with limited system resources.
Can I play these games on my Mac or Linux computer?
Interplanetary: Enhanced Edition is available on Apple Macintosh and Linux platforms. Blood and Bacon is exclusively available on PC Windows systems.