Blood and Bacon vs INSIDE
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs INSIDE — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | INSIDE Playdead |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | June 28, 2016 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Playdead |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Playdead |
| Age Rating | — | Teen |
| Official Site | — | http://www.playdead.com/ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Adventure, Indie, Puzzle, Platformer |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | First-person | — |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 4 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Apple Macintosh, Nintendo |
| Available On | Steam | Epic Games Store, PlayStation Store, Xbox Store, Steam, GOG, Nintendo eShop, App Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: Windows 7/10 Processor: Dual Core Memory: 512 MB RAM Graphics: Supported Storage: 10 MB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 4.4 / 5 (2,587 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 87 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs INSIDE: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a budget-friendly, accessible gaming experience, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs nothing to own—it is free—and runs on the most basic PC hardware: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up, 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor, 600 MB RAM, and 300 MB storage. In contrast, INSIDE requires a dual-core processor, 512 MB RAM, and 10 MB of available storage, making it far more demanding for older or lower-end devices. While INSIDE offers a higher community rating (4.4/5) and a Metacritic score of 87, Blood and Bacon supports multiple game modes including online multiplayer and co-op, which may appeal to players who enjoy social or playing with others. INSIDE is available on more platforms—including PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, and Nintendo—but it lacks co-op and multiplayer modes, limiting its practicality for group play. Blood and Bacon’s 3-hour playtime fits well for casual sessions, whereas INSIDE’s 4-hour playtime may feel long for shorter breaks. For affordability, accessibility, and broader gameplay modes, Blood and Bacon wins. For those with high-end hardware who value critical acclaim and single-player puzzle gameplay, INSIDE is a strong option, but it is not practical for most Filipino homes without upgrading hardware.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper to own in the Philippines?
Blood and Bacon is free, while INSIDE has no price listed.
Which game is more powerful in terms of system requirements?
INSIDE requires a dual Core processor, 512 MB RAM, and 10 MB of available space, whereas Blood and Bacon only needs a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, 600 MB RAM, and 300 MB storage.
Which game offers more social gameplay options?
Blood and Bacon supports Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, and Online Multiplayer, while INSIDE only supports Single-player.
Which game is better for players with limited storage?
Blood and Bacon requires 300 MB of available space, which is sufficient, while INSIDE only requires 10 MB of available space.