Blood and Bacon vs Full Throttle Remastered
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Full Throttle Remastered — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Full Throttle Remastered Double Fine Productions |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | April 17, 2017 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Double Fine Productions, Shiny Shoe |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Double Fine Productions |
| Age Rating | — | Teen |
| Official Site | — | http://fullthrottle.doublefine.com/ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Adventure |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | First-person | 2D |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 3 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Apple Macintosh, Linux |
| Available On | Steam | PlayStation Store, Xbox Store, Steam, GOG, itch.io, App Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: Windows 7 or Later Processor: Intel® Core™ 2 Duo 2.4 GHz, AMD Athlon™ X2 2.8 GHz, or higher Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260, ATI Radeon 4870 HD / Intel HD 4000 Graphics, or equivalent Storage: 8000 MB available space Sound Card: Windows Compatible Card Additional Notes: GPU that supports OpenGL 3.3 or higher |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 4.0 / 5 (436 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 77 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs Full Throttle Remastered: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, Full Throttle Remastered is the clear choice if you have a modern PC or console, offering a higher community rating (4.0 vs 3.1), a significantly larger storage requirement (8 GB vs 300 MB), and support for multiple platforms including PS, Xbox, and iOS. Blood and Bacon is only viable if you are on a very tight budget or have extremely limited storage, as it runs on Windows Vista with minimal RAM and graphics requirements, though it lacks the broader platform availability and higher critical acclaim of the remaster. The main practical difference is ecosystem flexibility: Full Throttle Remastered works on consoles and mobile devices, whereas Blood and Bacon is PC-exclusive. If you prioritize replayability and modern hardware, choose Full Throttle Remastered. If you are stuck with an older Windows Vista machine or have less than 1 GB of free disk space, Blood and Bacon is the only option, despite its lower community score.
Frequently asked questions
Which game requires less storage space?
Blood and Bacon requires only 300 MB, whereas Full Throttle Remastered requires 8000 MB (8 GB) of available space.
Which game is better for a Filipino buyer with a modern PC?
Full Throttle Remastered is the better choice for modern PCs, supporting Windows 7 or later with a Core 2 Duo or higher, compared to Blood and Bacon's older Windows Vista minimum.
Can I play Full Throttle Remastered on a console or mobile device?
Yes, Full Throttle Remastered is available on PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, and Apple Macintosh, while Blood and Bacon is PC-only.
Which game has a higher community rating and critical acclaim?
Full Throttle Remastered has a higher community rating (4.0/5 with 436 ratings) and a Metacritic score of 77/100, compared to Blood and Bacon's 3.1/5 rating.