Blood and Bacon vs Forager
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Forager — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Forager Humble Bundle |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | December 14, 2016 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Humble Bundle, HopFrog |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Humble Bundle |
| Official Site | — | https://hopfrogsa.net/forager |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Adventure, RPG, Strategy, Simulation, Indie |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | First-person | 2D |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 7 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Nintendo |
| Available On | Steam | itch.io, Xbox Store, App Store, GOG, Steam, Nintendo eShop, PlayStation Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: Windows XP and above Processor: 1.2Ghz Memory: 1024 MB RAM Graphics: 512MB Storage: 200 MB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 4.0 / 5 (228 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 78 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs Forager: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer seeking a balance of power, features, and practicality, Forager is the superior choice. While Blood and Bacon offers a first-person, co-op-focused experience on PC via Steam with a modest 3-hour average playtime, it requires older OS versions like Windows Vista and 7, 600 MB of RAM, and 300 MB of storage—limits that may challenge older devices. In contrast, Forager runs on modern OS (Windows XP and above), demands only 1024 MB of RAM, 200 MB of storage, and supports a wider range of platforms including PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, and Nintendo, making it more accessible and versatile. With a 7-hour average playtime, it delivers significantly more content than Blood and Bacon’s 3 hours. The game also boasts a 78/100 Metacritic score and a 4.0 community rating from 228 ratings, outperforming Blood and Bacon’s 3.1/5 rating from 115 ratings. For those needing broader compatibility, modern hardware, and deeper gameplay, Forager offers greater practicality and value. Blood and Bacon, though cheaper in terms of time investment, is restricted to PC and older systems, limiting its appeal for everyday use or device upgrades.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper to run on a typical Filipino PC?
Blood and Bacon requires Windows Vista, 7, 8 and up, 600 MB RAM, and 300 MB storage, while Forager needs Windows XP and above, 1024 MB RAM, and 200 MB storage—Forager has slightly lower requirements but Blood and Bacon’s storage is higher.
Which game is more powerful in terms of hardware demands?
Forager requires 1.2 GHz processor, 1024 MB RAM, and 512MB graphics, whereas Blood and Bacon needs 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, 600 MB RAM, and Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D, Hardware Acceleration DirectX 10—Forager’s specs are more robust.
Which game is better for daily commuting or multitasking?
Forager supports PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, and Nintendo, while Blood and Bacon is only for PC via Steam—Forager’s cross-platform support makes it more practical.
Which game offers better gameplay depth and duration?
Forager has an average playtime of 7 hours, compared to Blood and Bacon’s 3 hours—Forager delivers significantly more content.