Blood and Bacon vs FINAL FANTASY III (3D REMAKE)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs FINAL FANTASY III (3D REMAKE) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | FINAL FANTASY III (3D REMAKE) Square Enix, Square |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | November 14, 2006 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Square Enix, Square |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Square Enix, Square |
| Age Rating | — | Everyone 10+ |
| Official Site | — | http://archive.na.square-enix.com//ff3/ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | RPG |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | First-person | 2D |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 5 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, iOS, Android, Nintendo |
| Available On | Steam | GOG, PlayStation Store, Steam, Nintendo eShop, Google Play, App Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: Windows 8.1 64-bit / Windows 10 64-bit (ver.1909 and above) Processor: AMD A8-7600 / Intel® Core™ i3-2105 Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: AMD Radeon™ R7 Graphics / Intel® HD Graphics 3000 DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 1 GB available space |
| Recommended Requirements | — | OS: Windows 8.1 64-bit / Windows 10 64-bit (ver.1909 and above) Processor: AMD A8-7600 / Intel® Core™ i3-3225 Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: AMD Radeon™ R7 Graphics / Intel® HD Graphics 4000 DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 1 GB available space |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.8 / 5 (161 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 68 / 100 |