Blood and Bacon vs Fable: The Lost Chapters
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Fable: The Lost Chapters — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Fable: The Lost Chapters Microsoft Studios |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | September 1, 2005 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Lionhead Studios, Big Blue Box Studios |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Microsoft Studios |
| Age Rating | — | Mature |
| Official Site | — | http://lionhead.com/Fable/FableTLC/ |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Adventure, RPG |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player |
| Perspective | First-person | Third-person |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 2 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, Xbox, Apple Macintosh |
| Available On | Steam | Steam, Xbox 360 Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: Windows XP or later Processor: 1.4 GHz equivalent or greater Memory: 256MB Hard Disk Space: 3GB of available hard disk space Video Card: 64 MB shader-capable video card Sound: Sound card and either a set of speakers or a set of headphones are required for audio |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 4.4 / 5 (832 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 83 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs Fable: The Lost Chapters: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer seeking a budget-friendly, accessible gaming experience, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs nothing to acquire as it is free to download from Steam, making it the most practical option for those without financial constraints. The game runs on older Windows systems (Vista, 7, 8 and up) with minimal hardware requirements—600 MB RAM, 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor, and 300 MB storage—though it lacks modern graphics capabilities like Shader Model 3.0 or DirectX 10. It supports multiple resolutions and AA settings, which are useful for casual play. In contrast, Fable: The Lost Chapters requires significantly more power—3GB of hard disk space, 64 MB shader-capable video card, and a more powerful processor—and is priced at a higher cost due to its mature genre and multi-platform availability. While Fable offers a higher community rating (4.4/5) and 83 Metacritic score, its requirements are prohibitive for many local systems. Blood and Bacon’s lower barrier to entry, shorter playtime (3 hours), and broader accessibility make it the smarter pick for everyday play, especially for those on a tight budget. Fable, though more feature-rich, is better suited for dedicated enthusiasts with strong hardware setups.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper to play for a Filipino buyer?
Blood and Bacon is free to download from Steam, while Fable: The Lost Chapters has no price mentioned but requires higher hardware costs.
Which game is more powerful for older computers?
Blood and Bacon runs on Windows Vista, 7, 8 and up with 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor, while Fable requires Windows XP or later with 1.4 GHz equivalent or greater.
Which game is better for daily commuting?
Both games require PC platforms, but Fable needs 3GB of hard disk space and a 64 MB video card, which may be impractical for limited space and resources.
Which game has better community support?
Fable: The Lost Chapters has a community rating of 4.4/5 from 832 ratings, compared to Blood and Bacon’s 3.1/5 from 115 ratings.