Blood and Bacon vs Evoland

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Evoland — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Evoland Plug In Digital, Playdigious, Shiro Games
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 April 4, 2013
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Plug In Digital, Playdigious, Shiro Games
Publisher Grunge Games Plug In Digital, Playdigious, Shiro Games
Official Site — http://evoland.shirogames.com/
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Action, Adventure, RPG, Indie
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player
Perspective First-person 2D, 3D
Average Playtime 3 hours 3 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, Linux
Available On Steam GOG, Steam, Google Play, App Store
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS:Windows XP SP2 or later Processor:1.7 GHz single-core Memory:1 GB RAM Graphics:Directx 9.0c compatible video card DirectX®:9.0c Hard Drive:100 MB HD space
Recommended Requirements — OS:Windows 7 Processor:2.5 GHz dual-core Memory:2 GB RAM Graphics:Directx 9.0c compatible video card DirectX®:9.0c Hard Drive:100 MB HD space
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 3.8 / 5 (273 ratings)
Metacritic — 61 / 100

Blood and Bacon vs Evoland: which should you buy?

Evoland offers a wider platform reach and better community rating than Blood and Bacon. Evoland supports iOS, Android, Apple Macintosh, and Linux, making it more accessible for mobile users and those looking to play on different devices without needing a PC.

Frequently asked questions

Which game is cheaper?

The prices are not provided in the data, but Evoland has broader platform support which might be considered as an indirect cost savings for some buyers.

Which game requires more powerful hardware?

Blood and Bacon has higher minimum system requirements with a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and 600 MB RAM compared to Evoland's Windows XP SP2 or later processors and 1 GB RAM.

Which game is better for daily commuting on a PC?

Evoland requires less powerful hardware (Windows XP SP2 or later) making it more suitable for daily commuting on a PC, while Blood and Bacon has higher minimum requirements.

Which game offers more features?

Blood and Bacon supports multiple resolutions and AA settings, offering additional customization options. Evoland's community rating is slightly better but the number of supported platforms makes it more practical for broader audiences.