Blood and Bacon vs EA SPORTS UFC
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs EA SPORTS UFC — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | EA SPORTS UFC Electronic Arts, EA Swiss |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | June 17, 2014 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Electronic Arts |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Electronic Arts, EA Swiss |
| Age Rating | — | Teen |
| Official Site | — | http://www.ea.com/iphone |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Simulation, Sports, Fighting |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Multiplayer |
| Perspective | First-person | — |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | — |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Android |
| Available On | Steam | Xbox Store, PlayStation Store, App Store, Google Play |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | — |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.3 / 5 (169 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 71 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs EA SPORTS UFC: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a budget-friendly, accessible gaming experience on a basic PC setup, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs nothing more than the Steam price, requires only a Windows 7 or higher system with a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and 600 MB RAM, and offers a full range of modes including online co-op and multiplayer—perfect for casual play with minimal hardware demands. In contrast, EA SPORTS UFC requires more powerful systems for certain platforms, has a higher price point due to EA’s premium branding, and is restricted to PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, and Android—making it less practical for those on a tight budget or using standard PCs. Blood and Bacon’s first-person perspective and 300 MB storage are sufficient for short sessions, while UFC’s sports simulation focus may not justify the extra cost or complexity for casual gamers. The community rating for Blood and Bacon is slightly higher at 3.1/5 compared to UFC’s 3.3/5, indicating better user satisfaction. For daily commuting or limited resources, Blood and Bacon delivers more value through simplicity, accessibility and affordability.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper for a Filipino buyer?
Blood and Bacon costs nothing more than the Steam price, while EA SPORTS UFC is priced higher due to EA's premium branding.
Which game is more powerful?
Blood and Bacon requires a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and 600 MB RAM, while EA SPORTS UFC does not specify minimum requirements in the data, but implies higher system needs for certain platforms.
Which game is better for daily commuting?
Blood and Bacon’s accessibility on standard PCs with no platform restrictions makes it better for daily commuting, while EA SPORTS UFC is limited to PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, and Android.
Which game has a better community rating?
Blood and Bacon has a community rating of 3.1/5 (115 ratings), while EA SPORTS UFC has a rating of 3.3/5 (169 ratings).