Blood and Bacon vs EA SPORTS UFC 3

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs EA SPORTS UFC 3 — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games EA SPORTS UFC 3
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 February 2, 2018
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Electronic Arts
Publisher Grunge Games
Age Rating Teen
Official Site https://www.ea.com/games/ufc/ufc-3
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Sports
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Multiplayer
Perspective First-person 3D
Average Playtime 3 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PlayStation, Xbox
Available On Steam PlayStation Store, Xbox Store
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 3.6 / 5 (320 ratings)
Metacritic 76 / 100

Blood and Bacon vs EA SPORTS UFC 3: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer prioritizing affordability and accessibility, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs nothing to download on PC via Steam, while EA SPORTS UFC 3 requires a PlayStation or Xbox console purchase, adding significant upfront cost. Blood and Bacon runs on Windows Vista, 7, or 8 and up with a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and 600 MB RAM, making it a lightweight option for older hardware. EA SPORTS UFC 3 demands a 3D perspective on PlayStation or Xbox with no mention of system requirements, but lacks a specified minimum OS or memory. Blood and Bacon offers more gaming modes—including co-op and online multiplayer—and supports multiple resolutions and AA settings, while UFC 3 focuses solely on multiplayer with no details on depth or realism. For daily use, Blood and Bacon’s PC availability and lower barrier to entry make it more practical, though its short average playtime of 3 hours may limit engagement. UFC 3’s higher community rating of 3.6/5 suggests stronger player satisfaction, but at a price and accessibility gap. Given the data, Blood and Bacon wins for its value, ease of access, and broader gameplay options for budget-conscious Filipino gamers.

Frequently asked questions

Which game costs less to play in the Philippines?

Blood and Bacon costs nothing to download on PC via Steam, while EA SPORTS UFC 3 requires a PlayStation or Xbox console purchase, adding significant upfront cost.

Which game is more powerful for older computers?

Blood and Bacon runs on Windows Vista, 7, or 8 and up with a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 processor and 600 MB RAM, making it a lightweight option for older hardware.

Which game is better for daily commuting?

Blood and Bacon’s PC availability and lower barrier to entry make it more practical, though its short average playtime of 3 hours may limit engagement.

Which game has a better community reception?

EA SPORTS UFC 3 has a community rating of 3.6/5 (320 ratings), while Blood and Bacon has 3.1/5 (115 ratings).