Blood and Bacon vs Distrust

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Distrust — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Distrust Alawar Entertainment, Alawar Premium, CMGE Group
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 August 22, 2017
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Alawar Entertainment, Cheerdealers
Publisher Grunge Games Alawar Entertainment, Alawar Premium, CMGE Group
Age Rating Teen
Official Site http://distrust.info/
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Adventure, RPG, Strategy, Indie
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player
Perspective First-person Isometric
Average Playtime 3 hours 4 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Apple Macintosh, Nintendo
Available On Steam PlayStation Store, Nintendo eShop, Steam, Xbox Store, GOG, App Store
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Windows 7/8/10 Processor: Intel Core i3 560 3.33GHz or higher Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: GeForce 9600 GT/Radeon HD 3870 (512 MB DirectX: Version 9.0c Storage: 2 GB available space
Recommended Requirements OS: Windows 7/8/10 Processor: Intel Core i5 2.6+ GHz Memory: 4 GB RAM Graphics: GeForce GTX 460/Radeon HD 6850 (1GB) DirectX: Version 11 Storage: 2 GB available space
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 3.0 / 5 (96 ratings)
Metacritic 75 / 100

Blood and Bacon vs Distrust: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for a budget-friendly, versatile gaming experience, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It runs on older Windows systems (Vista, 7, 8 and up) with a minimum processor of 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, requiring only 600 MB RAM and 300 MB storage—making it highly practical for low-end PCs. In contrast, Distrust demands Windows 7/8/10 or higher, an Intel Core i3 3.33GHz processor, 4 GB RAM, and 2 GB storage, plus more complex graphics and system requirements, increasing the barrier to entry. Blood and Bacon is cheaper in terms of system needs and available on Steam, while Distrust offers a longer average playtime (4 hours vs 3 hours) and broader platform support including iOS and PlayStation. However, Blood and Bacon lacks multiplayer and co-op modes, whereas Distrust supports single-player only. For those with older hardware or limited storage, Blood and Bacon is more accessible. For players willing to upgrade their system for richer features and longer sessions, Distrust delivers a more complete experience despite higher demands. The choice depends on your current tech capability and budget—Blood and Bacon wins for practicality, Distrust for depth and platforms.

Frequently asked questions

Which game is cheaper to run on older Windows systems like Windows 7?

Blood and Bacon runs on Windows Vista, 7, 8 and up with a minimum processor of 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, 600 MB RAM, and 300 MB storage, while Distrust requires Windows 7/8/10 or higher, 4 GB RAM, and 2 GB storage.

Which game is more powerful in terms of system requirements?

Distrust requires an Intel Core i3 560 3.33GHz or higher processor, 4 GB RAM, GeForce 9600 GT/Radeon HD 3870 (512 MB), and DirectX 9.0c, while Blood and Bacon only needs 1.2 GHz Pentium 4.

Which game has more features for multiplayer gameplay?

Blood and Bacon supports Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer, while Distrust only supports Single-player.

Which game is better for daily commuting with limited storage?

Blood and Bacon requires 300 MB available space, whereas Distrust needs 2 GB available space, making Blood and Bacon more practical for space-limited devices.