Blood and Bacon vs Crypt of the NecroDancer

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Crypt of the NecroDancer — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Crypt of the NecroDancer Klei Entertainment, Brace Yourself Games
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 April 22, 2015
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Brace Yourself Games
Publisher Grunge Games Klei Entertainment, Brace Yourself Games
Age Rating Teen
Official Site http://necrodancer.com
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Action, RPG, Indie
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player, Co-op, Local Co-op
Perspective First-person 2D
Average Playtime 3 hours 4 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Apple Macintosh, Linux, Nintendo
Available On Steam PlayStation Store, Xbox Store, Steam, GOG, App Store
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Windows XP, service pack 3 Processor: 2GHz Memory: 1000 MB RAM Graphics: 512MB VRAM Storage: 1600 MB available space
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 4.0 / 5 (598 ratings)
Metacritic 87 / 100

Blood and Bacon vs Crypt of the NecroDancer: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for a budget-friendly, accessible experience, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs nothing more than the Steam price, runs on the most basic Windows systems—Windows Vista, 7, 8, and up—and only needs 600 MB of storage, making it ideal for low-end PCs. Crypt of the NecroDancer demands 1000 MB RAM, 1600 MB storage, and a more powerful system starting from Windows XP with service pack 3, while also requiring multiple platforms and higher graphics resources. Although Crypt of the NecroDancer offers a higher Metacritic score and more modes, its technical requirements are far more demanding and impractical for many local setups. Blood and Bacon’s single-player, multiplayer, co-op options on Steam provide solid gameplay without the complexity and cost of additional hardware. It is perfect for casual players who want a quick 3-hour session without sacrificing accessibility. Crypt of the NecroDancer’s indie appeal and longer playtime may attract fans of challenging gameplay, but its system needs are too high for most Filipino households.

Frequently asked questions

Which game is cheaper to run on a typical Filipino PC?

Blood and Bacon requires only 600 MB of storage and runs on Windows Vista, 7, 8, and up, while Crypt of the NecroDancer needs 1600 MB of storage and Windows XP with service pack 3.

Which game is more powerful in terms of system requirements?

Crypt of the NecroDancer requires 2GHz processor, 1000 MB RAM, 512MB VRAM, and Windows XP with service pack 3, whereas Blood and Bacon only needs a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4.

Which game has more platform flexibility for a Filipino buyer?

Crypt of the NecroDancer is available on PC, PlayStation, Xbox, iOS, Apple Macintosh, Linux, and Nintendo, while Blood and Bacon is only on PC via Steam.

Which game is better for daily commuting?

Crypt of the NecroDancer’s higher storage and system demands make it less practical for mobile or low-power setups, while Blood and Bacon’s minimal requirements and broad compatibility with basic Windows systems make it more suitable for everyday use.