Blood and Bacon vs Cortex Command

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Cortex Command — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Cortex Command Data Realms
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 September 28, 2012
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Data Realms
Publisher Grunge Games Data Realms
Official Site http://cortexcommand.com
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Action, Strategy, Indie
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player, Multiplayer, Local Co-op, Split-screen
Perspective First-person 2D
Average Playtime 3 hours 2 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, Apple Macintosh
Available On Steam Steam
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Microsoft® Windows® XP / Vista / 7 Processor: 1GHz processor Memory: 1GB RAM Hard Disk Space: 150MB HDD space Video Card: 640x480 (VGA) resolution monitor Additional: Should run on any PC released within the past 5 years.
Recommended Requirements OS: Microsoft® Windows® XP / Vista / 7 Processor: 3GHz or faster Memory: 2GB RAM Hard Disk Space: 150MB HDD space Video Card: 1920x1080 (full HD 1080p) resolution monitor Additional: Should run on any PC released within the past 5 years.
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 2.6 / 5 (247 ratings)
Metacritic 44 / 100

Blood and Bacon vs Cortex Command: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer prioritizing affordability and accessible gameplay, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs nothing more than the Steam price for PC, requiring only Windows Vista to 8 and up, 600 MB RAM, and 300 MB storage—minimal demands that make it ideal for casual play on older hardware. Cortex Command, though offering 2D perspective and local co-op, needs 1GB RAM, 150MB HDD space, and a VGA monitor, with a higher minimum OS requirement of Windows XP, making it less practical for modern setups. Blood and Bacon supports online multiplayer, co-op, and online modes, while Cortex Command is limited to split-screen or local play. Blood and Bacon’s 3-hour playtime fits better into short gaming sessions, whereas Cortex Command averages only 2 hours. Both support single-player, but Blood and Bacon’s broader multiplayer options offer more social value. Despite Cortex Command’s lower Metacritic score (44/100) and weaker hardware specs, it lacks the practicality of Blood and Bacon’s lower requirements and broader compatibility. For Filipino buyers on a budget seeking accessible, versatile gameplay without demanding high-end hardware, Blood and Bacon is the superior option.

Frequently asked questions

Which game offers more multiplayer options?

Blood and Bacon supports Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer, while Cortex Command only supports Multiplayer, Local Co-op, and Split-screen.