Blood and Bacon vs Capsized

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Capsized — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Capsized Bandai Namco Entertainment, Alientrap, Alientrap Games
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 April 28, 2011
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Alientrap, IndiePub
Publisher Grunge Games Bandai Namco Entertainment, Alientrap, Alientrap Games
Age Rating Teen
Official Site http://www.capsizedgame.com
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Action, Adventure, Indie, Platformer
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Local Co-op, Split-screen
Perspective First-person 2D
Average Playtime 3 hours 1 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, Xbox, Apple Macintosh, Linux
Available On Steam GOG, Steam, Xbox 360 Store
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: XP/Vista/Windows 7 Processor: Dual-core processor (Intel Dual Core 2.0 GHz or AMD Athlon X2 5200+ 2.6 GHz) Memory: 1.5 GB RAM Hard Disk Space: 1.0 GB free space Video Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible Sound: DirectX 9.0c compatible sound cards
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 2.8 / 5 (96 ratings)
Metacritic 80 / 100

Blood and Bacon vs Capsized: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for a budget-friendly, versatile gaming experience on a standard PC setup, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. At 300 MB of storage and a minimum Windows Vista OS, it requires far less than Capsized, which needs 1.0 GB of free space and a dual-core processor. Blood and Bacon supports online multiplayer, co-op, and multiple resolutions, offering more modern features despite its older release inaccessibility. Capsized, though more powerful with DirectX 9.0c compatibility and a higher Metacritic score, is limited to 1 hour playtime and older OS support. Capsized also lacks online multiplayer and has a lower community rating. Blood and Bacon’s lower requirements make it more practical for everyday use, while Capsized’s higher specs may not justify its age and fewer features for casual play. Blood and Bacon wins for its accessibility and modern gameplay options at a lower technical barrier.

Frequently asked questions

Which game costs less to install and run on a typical Filipino desktop setup?

Blood and Bacon requires only 300 MB of storage and runs on Windows Vista, 7, 8 and up, while Capsized needs 1.0 GB of free space and supports older OS like XP.

Which game offers more modern gameplay options and multiplayer features?

Blood and Bacon supports online multiplayer, co-op, and multiple resolutions, whereas Capsized is limited to local co-op, split-screen, and does not support online play.

Which game is more powerful in terms of hardware requirements?

Capsized requires a dual-core processor (Intel Dual Core 2.0 GHz or AMD Athlon X2 5200+ 2.6 GHz) and DirectX 9.0c compatible video card, while Blood and Bacon only needs a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4.

How much playtime difference is expected between the two games?

Blood and Bacon offers an average playtime of 3 hours, while Capsized has an average playtime of 1 hour.