Blood and Bacon vs Call of Duty: WWII
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Call of Duty: WWII — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games | Call of Duty: WWII Activision Blizzard |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 1, 2016 | November 3, 2017 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | BIG | Sledgehammer Games |
| Publisher | Grunge Games | Activision Blizzard |
| Age Rating | — | Mature |
| Official Site | — | https://www.callofduty.com/wwii |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Shooter |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Local Co-op, Online Multiplayer |
| Perspective | First-person | First-person |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 6 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC, PlayStation, Xbox |
| Available On | Steam | PlayStation Store, Steam, Xbox Store |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings | OS: Windows 7 64-Bit or later Processor: CPU: Intel® Core™ i3 3225 3.3 GHz or AMD Ryzen™ 5 1400 Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 660 @ 2 GB / GTX 1050 or ATI® Radeon™ HD 7850 @ 2GB / AMD RX 550 DirectX: Version 11 Network: Broadband Internet connection Storage: 90 GB available space Sound Card: DirectX Compatible |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) | 3.6 / 5 (1,185 ratings) |
| Metacritic | — | 77 / 100 |
Blood and Bacon vs Call of Duty: WWII: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer on a budget looking for a casual experience without demanding hardware, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. It costs nothing more than its Steam price, runs on basic Windows systems (Vista, 7, 8 and up), and only needs 600 MB RAM and 300 MB storage—ideal for casual play on older PCs. Call of Duty: WWII, while also first-person and with a higher community rating, requires significantly more power: 8 GB RAM, 90 GB storage, and modern OS requirements, costing more in terms of system setup and resources. The latter supports broader platforms (PlayStation, Xbox) but adds complexity for local users. Blood and Bacon wins for simplicity, affordability, and minimal hardware demands, making it more practical for daily use without needing a high-end PC.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper to run on a typical Filipino home PC?
Blood and Bacon costs nothing more than its Steam price, while Call of Duty: WWII requires more system resources and is not explicitly priced lower.
Which game is more powerful in terms of hardware requirements?
Call of Duty: WWII requires Intel® Core™ i3 3225 3.3 GHz or AMD Ryzen™ 5 1400, 8 GB RAM, and 90 GB storage, whereas Blood and Bacon only needs 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, 600 MB RAM, and 300 MB storage.
Which game is better for local usage with PlayStation or Xbox?
Call of Duty: WWII is available on PlayStation and Xbox, while Blood and Bacon is only on Steam and limited to PC platforms.
What is the average playtime difference between the two games?
Blood and Bacon has an average playtime of 3 hours, while Call of Duty: WWII has an average playtime of 6 hours.