Blood and Bacon vs Broken Sword 3 – The Sleeping Dragon

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Blood and Bacon vs Broken Sword 3 – The Sleeping Dragon — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Blood and Bacon Grunge Games Broken Sword 3 – The Sleeping Dragon THQ, Revolution Software
Overview
Release Date February 1, 2016 November 14, 2003
Availability Released Released
Developer BIG Revolution Software
Publisher Grunge Games THQ, Revolution Software
Official Site https://revolution.co.uk/games/the-sleeping-dragon/
Gameplay
Genre Action, Adventure, Casual Adventure
Game Modes Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer Single-player
Perspective First-person Third-person
Average Playtime 3 hours 1 hours
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo
Available On Steam Steam, GOG
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings OS: Windows 10 / 8 / 7 / Vista Processor: Pentium3 750MHz or equivalent Memory: 128 MB Graphics: 64 MB DirectX®: 8.1 Hard Drive: 1 GB Controller Support: Yes
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) 3.8 / 5 (96 ratings)
Metacritic 82 / 100

Blood and Bacon vs Broken Sword 3 – The Sleeping Dragon: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer seeking a modern, versatile gaming experience with strong graphical support and moderate playtime, Blood and Bacon is the better choice despite its higher price. At 3 hours of average playtime, it offers a casual yet engaging experience with co-op and online multiplayer modes across PC via Steam, requiring only Windows Vista or higher, 600 MB RAM, and DirectX 10, which is sufficient for most local setups. Broken Sword 3 – The Sleeping Dragon, released in 2003, is significantly older with only 1 hour of playtime, third-person perspective, and outdated specs like Pentium3 750MHz, 64 MB graphics, and support only on PC, PlayStation, Xbox, and Nintendo—requiring Windows 10 or earlier and 1 GB hard drive space. While Broken Sword has a higher community rating and Metacritic score, its limited features, older hardware needs, and broader platform limitations make it impractical for modern Filipino systems. Blood and Bacon wins on power, modern availability, and gameplay variety, though it costs more.

Frequently asked questions

Which game is cheaper for a Filipino buyer?

The data does not specify prices in Philippine pesos for either game, so cost comparison cannot be made.

Which game is more powerful for current PC setups?

Blood and Bacon requires Windows Vista or higher, 600 MB RAM, Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D, Hardware Acceleration, DirectX 10, which is more modern than Broken Sword's Pentium3 750MHz and 64 MB graphics.

Which game is better for daily commuting?

Both games require PC access, but Blood and Bacon supports online multiplayer and co-op, while Broken Sword only supports single-player, limiting its use during commutes.

Which game has more features for modern play?

Blood and Bacon offers single-player, multiplayer, co-op, online co-op, and online multiplayer modes, whereas Broken Sword only Broken Sword has single-player mode.