AudioSurf vs Blood and Bacon
A full spec-by-spec comparison of AudioSurf vs Blood and Bacon — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | AudioSurf | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | February 15, 2008 | February 1, 2016 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Developer | Dylan Fitterer | BIG |
| Official Site | http://www.audio-surf.com/ | — |
| Publisher | — | Grunge Games |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | Indie | Action, Adventure, Casual |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Co-op, Local Co-op | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer |
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 3 hours |
| Perspective | — | First-person |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC |
| Available On | Steam | Steam |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Microsoft® Windows® XP/Vista Processor: 1.6 GHz Intel® Pentium® 4 Memory: 512 MB RAM Graphics: 32 MB NVIDIA GeForce® 2 (support for Pixel Shader 3.0 recommended) DirectX Version: DirectX® 9.0 or higher Sound: DirectX® 9.0c-compatible sound card | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Metacritic | 85 / 100 | — |
| Community Rating | 3.9 / 5 (550 ratings) | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) |
AudioSurf vs Blood and Bacon: which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers prioritizing performance and value, Blood and Bacon is the better choice. Both games require PC platforms via Steam and have an average playtime of 3 hours, but Blood and Bacon is more powerful, needing only a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 and 600 MB RAM compared to AudioSurf’s 1.6 GHz Pentium 4 and 512 MB RAM. It supports higher resolutions, AA settings, and online multiplayer, while AudioSurf offers only local co-op. Blood and Bacon has a slightly higher community rating (3.1 vs 3.9) and more detailed hardware requirements, indicating better technical support. However, Blood and Bacon demands more storage (300 MB) and has fewer ratings. AudioSurf wins on price and simplicity, with a lower barrier to entry. For daily commuting or casual play sessions, Blood and Bacon’s online co-op and broader features may be more practical. Yet, AudioSurf’s 85 Metacritic score and 3.9 community rating suggest stronger long-term appeal. Given the data, Blood and Bacon offers better power and connectivity for a similar price range, making it the smarter pick for most Filipino gamers.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is cheaper to run on a typical Filipino PC?
AudioSurf has a lower minimum memory requirement of 512 MB RAM compared to Blood and Bacon’s 600 MB, but both run on PC via Steam, so cost depends on system specs.
Which game is more powerful for older hardware?
Blood and Bacon runs on a 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 and 600 MB RAM, while AudioSurf requires 1.6 GHz Pentium 4 and 512 MB RAM, making Blood and Bacon more compatible with older systems.
Which game has better online connectivity?
Blood and Bacon supports Multiplayer, Co-op, and Online Co-op, while AudioSurf only supports Local Co-op, making Blood and Bacon better for online play.
What is the community sentiment for these games?
AudioSurf has a higher community rating of 3.9 / 5 (550 ratings), while Blood and Bacon has a lower rating of 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings).