Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura vs Blood and Bacon
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura vs Blood and Bacon — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura Activision Blizzard | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Release Date | August 21, 2001 | February 1, 2016 |
| Availability | Released | Released |
| Age Rating | Teen | — |
| Developer | Troika Games | BIG |
| Publisher | Activision Blizzard | Grunge Games |
| Official Site | https://www.activision.com/ | — |
| Gameplay | ||
| Genre | RPG | Action, Adventure, Casual |
| Game Modes | Single-player, Co-op | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer |
| Perspective | Isometric | First-person |
| Average Playtime | 1 hours | 3 hours |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC |
| Available On | Steam, GOG | Steam |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS: Windows XP / Vista / 7 / 8 Processor: 1.0 GHz Memory: 256 MB RAM Graphics: DirectX 7 Compatible 3D Card DirectX: Version 7.0 Storage: 1200 MB available space Sound Card: DirectX Compatible | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings |
| Recommended Requirements | Processor: 1.4 GHz Memory: 512 MB RAM Graphics: DirectX 9 Compatible 3D Card DirectX: Version 9.0 Sound Card: DirectX Compatible | — |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Metacritic | 81 / 100 | — |
| Community Rating | 4.4 / 5 (322 ratings) | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) |
Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura vs Blood and Bacon: which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers seeking a budget-friendly RPG experience with strong performance and broad support, Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura is the better choice despite its older release date. At 1200 MB of storage and DirectX 7 compatibility, it requires minimal system resources compared to Blood and Bacon, which needs 300 MB of storage and DirectX 10. Arcanum offers a single-player and co-op RPG experience with an average playtime of 1 hour, while Blood and Bacon is an action-adventure game with longer playtime at 3 hours but supports more modes and online play. Arcanum has a higher Metacritic score of 81 compared to Blood and Bacon’s unspecified rating, and a stronger community rating of 4.4/5 versus 3.1/5. Both are available on Steam and GOG for PC, but Arcanum’s broader developer reputation and genre focus make it more practical for dedicated players. Blood and Bacon, though cheaper in storage needs, lacks depth in gameplay modes and technical requirements. Arcanum wins on power, storage efficiency, and community reception for a single-player RPG lover on a modest budget.
Frequently asked questions
Which game is more powerful for a PC with limited resources?
Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura has DirectX 7 compatible graphics and 1200 MB of storage, requiring lower minimum specs than Blood and Bacon which needs DirectX 10 and 300 MB of storage.
Which game offers better value for money in terms of features?
Blood and Bacon supports more game modes including multiplayer, co-op, and online play, but Arcanum offers a single-player and co-op RPG experience with a higher community rating and Metacritic scores alone.
Which game is better for daily commuting due to portability?
Both are PC games available on Steam, but Arcanum has a wider developer reputation and no mention of online multiplayer, while Blood and Bacon supports online multiplayer.
What is the difference in playtime between the two games?
Arcanum: Of Steamworks and Magick Obscura has an average playtime of 1 hour, while Blood and Bacon has an average playtime of 3 hours.