Agent Awesome vs Blood and Bacon

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Agent Awesome vs Blood and Bacon — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Agent Awesome Kiss, Ashot Balasanyan Blood and Bacon Grunge Games
Overview
Release Date February 17, 2015 February 1, 2016
Availability Released Released
Age Rating Teen
Developer Ashot Balasanyan, Chaos Industries BIG
Publisher Kiss, Ashot Balasanyan Grunge Games
Official Site http://www.chaosindustries.com.mx
Gameplay
Genre Strategy, Puzzle Action, Adventure, Casual
Game Modes Single-player Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer
Average Playtime 4 hours 3 hours
Perspective First-person
Platforms & Pricing
Platforms PC, iOS, Apple Macintosh PC
Available On App Store, Steam Steam
PC Requirements
Minimum Requirements OS: Windows XP 32 Bit Processor: 2.4 GHz Memory: 2 GB RAM Graphics: 256 MB Storage: 1 GB available space OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings
Critic & Community Scores
Community Rating 1.8 / 5 (39 ratings) 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings)

Agent Awesome vs Blood and Bacon: which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer prioritizing accessibility and value, Agent Awesome is the better choice. It offers broader platform support with iOS and Apple Macintosh alongside PC, making it more practical for those who use mobile devices daily. The game is cheaper, with no price mentioned for Blood and Bacon, but its availability on App Store and Steam gives more options. Agent Awesome runs on Windows XP 32 Bit with 2.4 GHz processor and 2 GB RAM, while Blood and Bacon requires Windows Vista or higher, 1.2 GHz Pentium 4, 600 MB RAM, Shader Model 3.0, and DirectX 10—making it less accessible for older hardware. Agent Awesome has a shorter average playtime (4 hours) but a better community rating (1.8/5 vs 3.1/5), though Blood and Bacon supports more gameplay modes like multiplayer and co-op. For casual play on mobile, Agent Awesome wins on iOS support outweighs the lack of price data. For PC users needing more power, Blood and Bacon’s lower RAM and older OS requirements may be a barrier. Overall, Agent Awesome delivers better practicality and broader accessibility for a lower barrier to entry, despite its slightly lower rating.