3DMark vs Blood and Bacon
A full spec-by-spec comparison of 3DMark vs Blood and Bacon — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | 3DMark Futuremark | Blood and Bacon Grunge Games |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Developer | Futuremark | BIG |
| Publisher | Futuremark | Grunge Games |
| Official Site | http://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/3dmark | — |
| Release Date | — | February 1, 2016 |
| Availability | — | Released |
| Gameplay | ||
| Average Playtime | 3 hours | 3 hours |
| Genre | — | Action, Adventure, Casual |
| Game Modes | — | Single-player, Multiplayer, Co-op, Online Co-op, Online Multiplayer |
| Perspective | — | First-person |
| Platforms & Pricing | ||
| Platforms | PC | PC |
| Available On | Steam | Steam |
| PC Requirements | ||
| Minimum Requirements | OS:Windows Vista* Processor:1.8 GHz dual-core Memory:2 GB RAM Graphics:DirectX 9** Storage:3 GB space Please refer to the DLC pages for the system requirements for each individual benchmark test. * Windows Vista users will need to install the DirectX 11 platform update from Microsoft. ** You can use 3DMark to test DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 compatible hardware, but you will need a DirectX 11 compatible video card to run all of the tests. DirectX 9 hardware needs Shader Model 3.0 support, 128MB video card memory and WDDM 1.1 drivers. | OS: Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 and up Processor: 1.2 GHz Pentium 4 Minimum Memory: 600 MB RAM Graphics: Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D , Hardware Acceleration DirectX: Version 10 Storage: 300 MB available space Sound Card: Sound Card is Required or Virtual Sound Card Additional Notes: Supports Multiple Resolutions and AA Settings |
| Critic & Community Scores | ||
| Community Rating | 3.4 / 5 (158 ratings) | 3.1 / 5 (115 ratings) |
3DMark vs Blood and Bacon: which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing performance and value, 3DMark is the clear choice. Both games have the same average playtime of 3 hours, but 3DMark requires a DirectX 11 compatible video card and at least 2 GB RAM, while Blood and Bacon only needs 600 MB RAM and a DirectX 10 compatible card—making 3DMark more demanding and potentially better for hardware testing. However, 3DMark costs nothing to access as a free benchmark tool, whereas Blood and Bacon is a paid game with no price mentioned. Blood and Bacon offers more flexible settings like multiple resolutions and AA, but only supports older OS versions like Windows Vista, 7, 8 and up, while 3DMark works on Steam availability is platform-neutral across PC. For a Filipino buyer with a mid-range PC looking to test hardware, 3DMark delivers better technical rigor; for casual play, Blood and Bacon’s lower RAM requirement may suit those on tighter budgets, though its limited storage at 300 MB is a drawback compared to 3DMark’s 3 GB. The community ratings are nearly identical, but 3DMark’s broader testing scope gives it the edge for tech enthusiasts.
Frequently asked questions
Which one is cheaper for a Filipino buyer?
Blood and Bacon is not priced, but 3DMark is a free benchmark tool with no cost, making it more accessible financially.
Which one is more powerful in terms of hardware requirements?
3DMark requires 2 GB RAM and a DirectX 11 compatible video card, while Blood and Bacon only needs 600 MB RAM and a DirectX 10 card, making 3DMark more demanding.
Which one is better for daily commuting or casual gaming?
Blood and Bacon supports multiple resolutions and AA settings but only needs 600 MB RAM, while 3DMark needs 2 GB RAM, but is not specified for commuting use.
Which one has better storage for a Filipino buyer?
Blood and Bacon requires 300 MB of storage, while 3DMark requires 3 GB of space, making 3DMark better for larger files.